Complaints about the quality and quantity of the winning bid.
It goes without saying that the organization or person that wins a bid should provide the best and winning service for which it was bid. However, if the winning bidder actually provides substandard service, then this is a clear sign that their is something amiss. If the winning bidder is not providing the standard of service and care that the winning bidder is expected to provide, yet wins the bid anyway, then the possibility of fraud should at least be explored.
My thanks to Charles Piper and the July/August 2012 edition of Fraud Magazine for this article.
It goes without saying that the organization or person that wins a bid should provide the best and winning service for which it was bid. However, if the winning bidder actually provides substandard service, then this is a clear sign that their is something amiss. If the winning bidder is not providing the standard of service and care that the winning bidder is expected to provide, yet wins the bid anyway, then the possibility of fraud should at least be explored.
My thanks to Charles Piper and the July/August 2012 edition of Fraud Magazine for this article.
NOTE: THE INFORMATION IN THIS BLOG IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE NOR
IS IT INTENDED TO BE LEGAL ADVICE. IF
THE READER HAS ANY LEGAL QUESTIONS, PLEASE REFER TO AN ATTORNEY.
Have a great and fraud-free day.
----------à>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>gene
tausk
No comments:
Post a Comment